StocksInsight

ZS Stock vs the S&P 500: Returns, Risk and Crash History

Zscaler, Inc., technology (market value $36.7 billion): how it compared with the S&P 500, how it behaved in every crash since 2008, its risk‑adjusted returns and what analysts said. Returns to Oct 30, 2026; analyst data as of Nov 9, 2026.

Published Updated 4 min readHow we research

What changed since Nov 2

Exent re-checks this page every day. Ratings appear 30 days after they are published; the top‑ranked analysts’ calls are not counted here, they are in Gems.

+43 new ratings+1 analyst started coverage83% Buy ratings (was 82%)40 analysts covering (was 39)34 4★+ analysts covering (was 33)

Key takeaways

  • ZS returned −25.4% over the 5 years to Oct 30, 2026 versus +75.9% for the S&P 500: it lagged the index.
  • Its 5-year Sharpe ratio was 0.04 against 0.58 for the S&P 500.
  • Its deepest crisis drawdown was −57.6% in the 2022 inflation bear market (S&P 500: −25.4%).
  • Five‑year volatility was 56.7% and beta 0.82.
  • 40 analysts rated it in the past year; 83% of their latest calls were Buy.
  • ZS beat earnings estimates in 12 of its last 12 reports; the stock moved 8.3% on average, up or down, around each report.

What do the best‑ranked analysts on ZS say now? See it in Exent Gems →

Did ZS beat the S&P 500?

Over the 5 years to Oct 30, 2026, Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) returned −25.4% including dividends, versus +75.9% for the S&P 500 (SPY). It lagged the index by 101.3 percentage points, or −5.7% a year against +12.0%.

PeriodZSS&P 500ZS per yearS&P 500 per yearResult
1 year−28.2%+12.0%−28.2%+12.0%Lagged
3 years+49.9%+87.4%+14.4%+23.3%Lagged
5 years−25.4%+75.9%−5.7%+12.0%Lagged
Period1 year3 years5 years
ZS−28.2%+49.9%−25.4%
S&P 500+12.0%+87.4%+75.9%
ZS per year−28.2%+14.4%−5.7%
S&P 500 per year+12.0%+23.3%+12.0%
ResultLaggedLaggedLagged

Total return with dividends reinvested, from month-end prices to Oct 30, 2026. Beating the index on raw return is only half the story: the next section adjusts for the risk taken. See also how to beat the S&P 500.

What Wall Street analysts say about ZS

In the 12 months to 30 days ago, 40 analysts published 577 ratings on ZS. Their latest calls were 83% Buy, 18% Hold and 0% Sell. 34 of them rank 4★ or higher in Exent’s analyst scoring, which is based on each analyst’s past price‑target hit rate and returns.

The consensus 12‑month price target was $222.58 (range $150.00–$298.00), +14.2% from the last price. Remember that the average analyst’s target is hit only about half the time: how accurate are price targets?

Top‑ranked analyst coveringFirmStarsPrice‑target hit rate
??????5.0★62.5%
Jonathan RuykhaverCantor Fitzgerald5.0★57.3%
??????5.0★58.1%
??????4.9★67.1%
??????4.9★49.4%

Other analysts covering ZS: Peter Weed · Peter Levine · Eric Heath · Gray Powell · Adam Borg · Roger Boyd

Ratings are shown with a 30‑day delay. Who the top‑ranked analysts on ZS are, their live calls and the median target of only the top‑rated analysts are in Exent Gems.

The average analyst’s target is reached about 53.1% of the time; Exent Gems is built on the top 50 of Exent’s ranking,where some reached 90% or more over the last two years. Unlock the top 50 analysts.

ZS returns by year vs the S&P 500

ZS beat the S&P 500 in 4 of the 7 full calendar years shown.

YearZSS&P 500Difference
2026 (to Oct 30, 2026)+5.7%+11.7%−6.0%
2025+24.7%+17.7%+7.0%
2024−18.6%+24.9%−43.5%
2023+98.0%+26.2%+71.8%
2022−65.2%−18.2%−47.0%
2021+60.9%+28.7%+32.2%
2020+329.5%+18.3%+311.2%
2019+18.6%+31.2%−12.6%

ZS risk-adjusted returns: Sharpe, Sortino and volatility

Over 5 years, ZS had a Sharpe ratio of 0.04 against 0.58 for the S&P 500, so it earned less return per unit of risk than the index. Its annualized volatility was 48.8% and its beta 0.82: it tended to move about 0.8× as much as the market.

MetricZSS&P 500
Annual return−5.7%+12.0%
Volatility (annualized)48.8%15.5%
Sharpe ratio0.040.58
Sortino ratio0.060.91
Max drawdown (month-end)−74.0%−23.9%
Beta to the S&P 5000.821.00

Sharpe divides return above cash by total volatility; Sortino counts only downside volatility. Both use monthly returns and the 1–3 month T‑bill ETF (BIL) as the risk‑free rate.

How ZS behaved in past crashes

ZS’s deepest fall in the crises below was −57.6% in the 2022 inflation bear market, against −25.4% for the S&P 500. The last column turns that into money: what a $100,000 position would have lost from peak to trough.

CrisisZSS&P 500Loss on $100,000
2018 trade-war selloff−24.4%−20.2%−$24,370
COVID crash (Feb–Mar 2020)−39.4%−34.1%−$39,400
2022 inflation bear market−57.6%−25.4%−$57,650
2025 tariff selloff−19.0%−19.0%−$19,030
WindowZS max drawdown
Last 1 year−64.9%
Last 3 years−64.9%
Last 5 years−76.4%
Last 10 years−76.4%

Peak‑to‑trough declines from daily prices inside each crisis window. A crash replay does not predict the next crisis; it shows how much room a holding needs. Run the same replay on a whole portfolio with the crash test.

What moves with ZS, and what doesn’t

Correlation runs from −1 (moves opposite) to +1 (moves in lockstep). Over the last 60 months of monthly returns, ZS’s correlation with the S&P 500 was 0.26, with the Nasdaq‑100 0.38, with long Treasuries (TLT) 0.16 and with gold (GLD) −0.14.

Adding a 5% ZS position to an S&P 500 portfolio would have moved its 5‑year volatility from 15.5% to 15.5%.

Least correlated large capsCorrelationMost correlated large capsCorrelation
XOM−0.36NET0.66
MRK−0.29PLTR0.64
PEP−0.27CRWD0.60
KO−0.24UBER0.59
SO−0.24PANW0.53

Holdings that are highly correlated behave like one position in a selloff. See how to find hidden overlap.

Latest ZS upgrades, downgrades and price‑target changes

DateRating and targetAnalyst
Oct 23Target raised
Buy
Target $285, was $240
Tal Liani
Bank of America Securities
Oct 20New coverage
Hold
Target $215
Rudy Kessinger
D.A. Davidson
Oct 15Target raised
Buy
Target $260, was $245
Fatima Boolani
Citi
Oct 7Target raised
Buy
Target $245, was $205
Fatima Boolani
Citi
Oct 7Target raised
Buy
Target $254, was $214
John Difucci
Guggenheim
Oct 7Target raised
Buy
Target $230, was $200
Shaul Eyal
TD Cowen
Oct 7Target raised
Buy
Target $255, was $215
Mike Cikos
Needham
Oct 7Target raised
Buy
Target $250, was $220
Joseph Gallo
Jefferies
Oct 7Target raised
Buy
Target $235, was $200
Adam Borg
Stifel Nicolaus
Oct 7Target raised
Buy
Target $225, was $220
Saket Kalia
Barclays
Oct 7Target raised
Buy
Target $235, was $220
Gregg Moskowitz
Mizuho Securities
Oct 7New coverage
Buy
Target $250, was $220
Daniel Ives
Yorkville Ives & Co

Named analysts’ rating and price‑target changes on ZS in the 5 weeks to Oct 12, 2026, shown 30 days after publication (the free analysts’ calls 3 days after). The top‑ranked analysts’ calls are in Exent Gems. See all of the latest analyst upgrades and downgrades.

Do analysts get ZS right?

Of the 876 analyst price targets on ZS set from 2019 until a year ago, 76.7% were reached within 12 months (data to Oct 20, 2026), 8.1 points above the 68.6% hit rate of the median stock in Exent’s study of 794 stocks. Targets that were reached took a median of 51 days. The median target sat 16.3% above the share price on the day it was set.

Where analysts said ZS would be by now: a year ago, 8 analysts had a price target on ZS, and the median of their latest targets was $342.50. On Oct 20, 2026 ZS closed at $214.51, 37.4% below it.

76.7%of targets reached within 12 monthsMedian stock: 68.6%
51 daysmedian time to reach a target
−37.4%price now vs the median target set a year ago
AfterCallsMove on the call3 months vs S&P 500
Upgrades of ZS27+1.5%+8.6%
Upgrades, all stocks11,514+2.5%+3.4%
Downgrades of ZS15−4.6%+1.4%
Downgrades, all stocks10,700−3.0%−1.6%

The move on the call runs from the close before the rating change to the close after it; the last column is the stock’s return minus the S&P 500’s over the next three months. Averages of rating changes on ZS through Sep 15, 2026; analysts are not named here. Do analyst upgrades move stocks?

How ZS moves after earnings

ZS beat the consensus earnings‑per‑share estimate in 12 of its last 12 quarterly reports, through the one on Sep 3, 2026, and the revenue estimate in 11 of 12. From the close before each report to the close after it, the stock moved 8.3% on average, up or down, against 6.8% for the average report across the 1,002 US stocks Exent tracks. It rose after 4 of the 12 reports. In 8 of the 12 beats the stock still fell.

12/12earnings beats
±8.3%average move per report
4/12reports followed by a rise
ReportEPS vs estimateRevenue vs estimateStock move
Sep 3, 2026$1.19 vs $1.09+2.4%−1.7%
May 26, 2026$1.08 vs $1.01+1.8%−30.7%
Feb 26, 2026$1.01 vs $0.89+2.2%−5.6%
Nov 25, 2025$0.96 vs $0.86+1.9%−10.1%
Sep 2, 2025$0.89 vs $0.80+1.7%−2.3%
May 29, 2025$0.84 vs $0.75+1.7%+8.7%
Mar 5, 2025$0.78 vs $0.69+2.1%+4.3%
Dec 2, 2024$0.77 vs $0.63+3.7%−3.8%

Reported earnings per share against the consensus estimate, revenue surprise in percent, and the stock’s price change over the two sessions around the report. How stocks move after earnings

Where ZS’s revenue comes from

In fiscal 2019 (the year to Jul 31, 2019), ZS’s largest reported region was the United States, with 49.1% of its $302.8 million revenue. By region: United States 49.1%; Emea 41.1%; Asia Pacific 7.9%; Other 1.9%.

By business, the largest segment was Reportable Segment, with 100.0% of $3.4 billion revenue (+25.4% on the year before).

  • United States49.1%
  • Emea41.1%
  • Asia Pacific7.9%
  • Other1.9%

From ZS’s annual filings; segment growth compares fiscal 2026 with the year before. Regions are as each company reports them, so one company’s “Asia Pacific” is not another’s. China counts the regions a company reports as China, Greater China or Hong Kong; a separately reported Taiwan is not counted. Which S&P 500 companies depend most on China?

Members of Congress who traded ZS

As of Oct 20, 2026, 4 members of Congress had disclosed 11 trades in ZS (5 buys and 6 sales) in STOCK Act disclosures filed with the House and Senate. The latest public trade is dated Jan 13, 2025.

Trade dateMemberTypeAmount
Jan 13, 2025Rob BresnahanSale$1,001–$15,000
Sep 17, 2024Ro KhannaBuy$1,001–$15,000
Apr 10, 2023Daniel GoldmanSale$15,001–$50,000
Dec 6, 2022Ro KhannaSale$1,001–$15,000
Nov 3, 2022Ro KhannaBuy$1,001–$15,000
May 5, 2022Ro KhannaSale$1,001–$15,000
Apr 11, 2022Ro KhannaBuy$1,001–$15,000
Feb 17, 2022Ro KhannaBuy$1,001–$15,000
Jan 21, 2022Ro KhannaSale$1,001–$15,000
Jan 6, 2021Thomas SuozziSale$15,001–$50,000

Amounts are the ranges members report, not exact values. The STOCK Act gives members up to 45 days to disclose a trade, so trades appear weeks after they are made. See every member’s disclosed trades

Are ZS insiders buying or selling?

In the 12 months to Oct 20, 2026, ZS insiders made no open‑market purchases and 56 sales worth $21.5 million, according to SEC Form 4 filings. The last open‑market purchase on record was on Dec 23, 2022.

After the 5 insider purchases of $10,000 or more since 2012, ZS beat the S&P 500 by an average of 109.1 percentage points over the next 12 months; every one was followed by a beat. Across all 17,865 insider purchases in Exent’s study, the average was +17.2% and the median +1.0% against the index.

Q1 ’25
Q2 ’25
Q3 ’25
Q4 ’25
Q1 ’26
Q2 ’26
Q3 ’26
Q4 ’26
DateInsiderRoleValue
Dec 23, 2022Brown Andrew William FraserDirector$543,900
Mar 20, 2018Darling Scott CDirector$1.0 million
Mar 20, 2018Giancarlo Charles HDirector$2.0 million
Mar 20, 2018Blasing KarenDirector$250,000
Mar 20, 2018Bess LaneDirector$1.8 million

The table lists the latest open‑market purchases on record, leaving out the last 30 days. The chart counts Form 4 purchases and sales by calendar quarter. Purchases are open‑market buys; sales include planned sales under 10b5‑1 trading plans. Do insider buys beat the market?

How much of ZS is sold short?

As of the Sep 30, 2026 settlement date, 5.46% of ZS’s float was sold short: 5.8 million shares, or 1.8 days of average trading volume to cover. A year earlier (Oct 15, 2025) it was 5.05%. The median across the 997 US stocks Exent tracks was 4.77%, so ZS is more heavily shorted than most.

  • Apr 30, 20269.58%
  • May 29, 202611.36%
  • Jun 30, 20267.80%
  • Jul 31, 20266.99%
  • Aug 31, 20265.98%
  • Sep 30, 20265.46%

From FINRA short‑interest reports, filed twice a month; the bars show the short share of the float at each month‑end. Days to cover divides the shares short by the average daily volume. The most shorted stocks

How many institutions own ZS?

At the end of Q2 2026 (Jun 30, 2026), 842 institutions reported holding ZS in 13F filings, up 18 from the quarter before and down from 995 a year earlier. Their reported holdings add up to 51.5% of ZS’s shares. In the quarter 429 institutions added to their positions and 255 cut them.

84213F holders
140new positions
139positions closed
51.5%of shares held by 13F filers

Investment managers with over $100 million in US equities file 13F reports within 45 days of each quarter end, so this is the latest complete quarter. Holdings can add up to more than 100% when shares are lent and counted twice. Which stocks institutions are buying and selling

Is ZS diluting shareholders?

ZS’s diluted share count rose 18.1% over the five fiscal years to fiscal 2026 and rose 3.8% in fiscal 2026 alone. Each share now owns a smaller slice of the company. The median change across the 1,005 US stocks Exent tracks was −0.1%.

Stock‑based compensation was $821.9 million in fiscal 2026, 24.5% of revenue. ZS did not buy back shares in fiscal 2026.

+3.8%share count, 1 year
+18.1%share count, 5 years
24.5%stock pay as % of revenue
0.00%buyback yield

Weighted‑average diluted shares from ZS’s annual income statements; stock‑based compensation and buybacks from its cash‑flow statement. Stock dilution and stock‑based compensation, explained

ZS financial health scores

In Exent’s Oct 20, 2026 snapshot, ZS’s Altman Z‑score was 4.46, in the safe zone (where 465 of the 794 non‑financial US stocks Exent tracks sit). Its Piotroski F‑score was 4 out of 9; 88% of scored stocks reach 4 or more.

4.46Altman Z‑score: safe zone
4/9Piotroski F‑score

The Altman Z‑score combines five balance‑sheet and earnings ratios into one bankruptcy‑risk score: below 1.81 is the distress zone, 1.81–2.99 grey, above 2.99 safe. It is not meaningful for banks, insurers and REITs. The Piotroski F‑score counts nine yes/no tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency; 8–9 is strong, 0–2 weak. Both come from the latest annual statements. Which stocks have the highest bankruptcy risk?

Which ETFs hold ZS?

As of Oct 20, 2026, 33 of the 304 ETFs Exent tracks held ZS. Its largest weight is in BUG (Global X Cybersecurity ETF), at 5.75% of the fund.

ETFFundWeight of ZS
BUGGlobal X Cybersecurity ETF5.75%
IGViShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF0.78%
IWPiShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF0.66%
VOTVanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund0.50%
VXFVanguard Extended Market Index Fund ETF Shares0.25%
JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF0.21%
VOVanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares0.21%
IWRiShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF0.17%

Owning several of these funds stacks the same position. How much do VOO, QQQ and VTI overlap?

The right benchmark for ZS

Exent matches every holding to the index with the most similar risk. For ZS that is QQQ (the Nasdaq‑100). Comparing a holding with an index that carries very different risk makes good results look bad and risky ones look clever. Read why the S&P 500 is the wrong benchmark for most portfolios.

Other technology stocks

TickerName5‑year returnVolatility (5y)
AAPLApple Inc.+135.9%28.0%
NVDANVIDIA Corporation+704.3%51.1%
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation+64.0%26.5%
AVGOBroadcom Inc.+570.0%44.7%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.+1,211%51.9%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.+319.9%58.3%
PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc.+611.4%64.4%
ORCLOracle Corporation+45.7%40.4%

Data and methodology

Returns are total returns from month‑end adjusted closing prices (dividends reinvested) through Oct 30, 2026. Crisis drawdowns and trailing maximum drawdowns use daily prices. Analyst coverage counts ratings published in the last 12 months, shown with a 30‑day delay. Full method: Exent methodology.

Company data as of Oct 20, 2026. The move around an earnings report runs from the close before it to the close after it; a price target counts as hit when the stock closed at or beyond it within 12 months (Exent analyst data). Revenue by region and segment, share counts and executive pay come from company filings; insider trades from SEC Form 4, short interest from FINRA, institutional ownership from 13F filings, Congress trades from STOCK Act disclosures filed with the House and Senate, federal contracts from USAspending.gov. Filings from the last 30 days are shown as counts only.

Past performance does not guarantee future results. Historical figures are calculated by Exent from market data and are for education only; they are not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security.

Check ZS with Exent Gems

Wall Street’s average ZS price target is 14.2% above the latest share price. See what the best‑ranked analysts on ZS say now in Exent Gems.

  1. Exent ranks Wall Street analysts by their past price‑target hit rate and returns, and keeps the best‑ranked few.
  2. Gems shows who the top‑ranked analysts covering ZS are, their live calls and the median target of only the top‑rated analysts.
  3. Gems flags the stocks where several top‑ranked analysts agree: a starting point for your own research, not a promise.

Exent is our product. Educational content, not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

No. ZS returned −25.4% (−5.7% a year) over the 5 years to Oct 30, 2026, versus +75.9% (+12.0% a year) for the S&P 500, including dividends.

No. As of Oct 20, 2026, ZS (Zscaler, Inc.) is not one of the 503 stocks in the S&P 500.

No. As of Oct 20, 2026, ZS (Zscaler, Inc.) is not one of the 101 stocks in the Nasdaq-100.

ZS fell −39.4% from peak to trough during the covid crash (feb–mar 2020), versus −34.1% for the S&P 500.

ZS fell −57.6% from peak to trough during the 2022 inflation bear market, versus −25.4% for the S&P 500.

Over the 5 years to Oct 30, 2026, ZS’s Sharpe ratio was 0.04 and its Sortino ratio 0.06, versus 0.58 and 0.91 for the S&P 500.

ZS’s 5‑year annualized volatility was 56.7%, higher than the S&P 500’s 17.0%, with a beta of 0.82.

Among large US stocks, the lowest correlations with ZS over the last 60 months were XOM (−0.36), MRK (−0.29), PEP (−0.27). Its correlation with long Treasuries (TLT) was 0.16 and with gold (GLD) −0.14.

ZS beat the consensus earnings-per-share estimate in 12 of its last 12 quarterly reports through Sep 3, 2026, and the revenue estimate in 11 of 12. The stock moved 8.3% on average, up or down, from the close before each report to the close after it.

Yes. As of Oct 20, 2026, 4 members of Congress had disclosed 11 trades in ZS (5 buys and 6 sales) in STOCK Act disclosures filed with the House and Senate.

As of the Sep 30, 2026 settlement date, 5.46% of ZS’s float was sold short (5.8 million shares, 1.8 days to cover), according to FINRA short-interest reports. A year earlier it was 5.05%.

Yes. ZS’s diluted share count rose 18.1% over the five fiscal years to fiscal 2026 and rose 3.8% in the latest year. Stock-based compensation was 24.5% of revenue.

What do the best‑ranked analysts say on ZS now?

Exent ranks Wall Street analysts by their track record. Gems shows who the top‑ranked analysts on ZS are, their latest calls and the stocks where several of them agree.

See this week’s GemsLimited offer$1.95 for full access· full access

Educational content, not investment advice. Examples are illustrative; past performance does not guarantee future results.

DISCLAIMER: Exent AI is an informational research platform and does not provide investment advice, financial advice, or act as an investment adviser, broker-dealer, or fiduciary. All content, analytics, and model outputs are provided for educational and informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any financial instrument. Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. Exent AI does not execute trades, hold customer funds, or provide brokerage services. Past performance and hypothetical results are not indicative of future results. Third-party data and AI-generated outputs may be incomplete or inaccurate.