StocksInsight

LSCC Stock vs the S&P 500: Returns, Risk and Crash History

Lattice Semiconductor Corporation, technology (market value $15.0 billion): how it compared with the S&P 500, how it behaved in every crash since 2008, its risk‑adjusted returns and what analysts said. Returns to Oct 30, 2026; analyst data as of Nov 9, 2026.

Published Updated 4 min readHow we research

What changed since Nov 2

Exent re-checks this page every day. Ratings appear 30 days after they are published; the top‑ranked analysts’ calls are not counted here, they are in Gems.

+1 new rating+1 analyst started coverage15 analysts covering (was 14)13 4★+ analysts covering (was 12)

Key takeaways

  • LSCC returned +33.9% over the 5 years to Oct 30, 2026 versus +75.9% for the S&P 500: it lagged the index.
  • Its 5-year Sharpe ratio was 0.31 against 0.58 for the S&P 500.
  • Its deepest crisis drawdown was −75.4% in the global financial crisis (2007–09) (S&P 500: −56.5%).
  • Five‑year volatility was 53.8% and beta 1.90.
  • 15 analysts rated it in the past year; 93% of their latest calls were Buy.
  • LSCC beat earnings estimates in 3 of its last 12 reports; the stock moved 9.3% on average, up or down, around each report.

What do the best‑ranked analysts on LSCC say now? See it in Exent Gems →

Did LSCC beat the S&P 500?

Over the 5 years to Oct 30, 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) returned +33.9% including dividends, versus +75.9% for the S&P 500 (SPY). It lagged the index by 42.0 percentage points, or +6.0% a year against +12.0%.

PeriodLSCCS&P 500LSCC per yearS&P 500 per yearResult
1 year+27.4%+12.0%+27.4%+12.0%Beat
3 years+67.2%+87.4%+18.7%+23.3%Lagged
5 years+33.9%+75.9%+6.0%+12.0%Lagged
10 years+1,432%+316.3%+31.4%+15.3%Beat
  • 1 year
    LSCC
    +27.4%
    S&P 500
    +12.0%
    LSCC per year
    +27.4%
    S&P 500 per year
    +12.0%
    Result
    Beat
  • 3 years
    LSCC
    +67.2%
    S&P 500
    +87.4%
    LSCC per year
    +18.7%
    S&P 500 per year
    +23.3%
    Result
    Lagged
  • 5 years
    LSCC
    +33.9%
    S&P 500
    +75.9%
    LSCC per year
    +6.0%
    S&P 500 per year
    +12.0%
    Result
    Lagged
  • 10 years
    LSCC
    +1,432%
    S&P 500
    +316.3%
    LSCC per year
    +31.4%
    S&P 500 per year
    +15.3%
    Result
    Beat

Total return with dividends reinvested, from month-end prices to Oct 30, 2026. Beating the index on raw return is only half the story: the next section adjusts for the risk taken. See also how to beat the S&P 500.

What Wall Street analysts say about LSCC

In the 12 months to 30 days ago, 15 analysts published 85 ratings on LSCC. Their latest calls were 93% Buy, 0% Hold and 7% Sell. 13 of them rank 4★ or higher in Exent’s analyst scoring, which is based on each analyst’s past price‑target hit rate and returns.

The consensus 12‑month price target was $178.13 (range $160.00–$200.00), +60.1% from the last price. Remember that the average analyst’s target is hit only about half the time: how accurate are price targets?

Top‑ranked analyst coveringFirmStarsPrice‑target hit rate
??????5.0★70.9%
??????5.0★67.8%
Blayne CurtisJefferies5.0★62.8%
??????5.0★55.3%
??????5.0★57.3%

Other analysts covering LSCC: Melissa Weathers · Srini Pajjuri · Gary Mobley · Melissa Fairbanks

Ratings are shown with a 30‑day delay. Who the top‑ranked analysts on LSCC are, their live calls and the median target of only the top‑rated analysts are in Exent Gems.

The average analyst’s target is reached about 53.1% of the time; Exent Gems is built on the top 50 of Exent’s ranking,where some reached 90% or more over the last two years. Unlock the top 50 analysts.

LSCC returns by year vs the S&P 500

LSCC beat the S&P 500 in 6 of the 9 full calendar years shown.

YearLSCCS&P 500Difference
2026 (to Oct 30, 2026)+26.4%+11.7%+14.7%
2025+29.9%+17.7%+12.2%
2024−17.9%+24.9%−42.8%
2023+6.3%+26.2%−19.9%
2022−15.8%−18.2%+2.4%
2021+68.2%+28.7%+39.5%
2020+139.4%+18.3%+121.1%
2019+176.6%+31.2%+145.4%
2018+19.7%−4.6%+24.3%
2017−21.5%+21.7%−43.2%

LSCC risk-adjusted returns: Sharpe, Sortino and volatility

Over 5 years, LSCC had a Sharpe ratio of 0.31 against 0.58 for the S&P 500, so it earned less return per unit of risk than the index. Its annualized volatility was 55.0% and its beta 1.90: it tended to move about 1.9× as much as the market.

MetricLSCCS&P 500
Annual return+6.0%+12.0%
Volatility (annualized)55.0%15.5%
Sharpe ratio0.310.58
Sortino ratio0.490.91
Max drawdown (month-end)−53.8%−23.9%
Beta to the S&P 5001.901.00

Sharpe divides return above cash by total volatility; Sortino counts only downside volatility. Both use monthly returns and the 1–3 month T‑bill ETF (BIL) as the risk‑free rate.

How LSCC behaved in past crashes

LSCC’s deepest fall in the crises below was −75.4% in the global financial crisis (2007–09), against −56.5% for the S&P 500. The last column turns that into money: what a $100,000 position would have lost from peak to trough.

CrisisLSCCS&P 500Loss on $100,000
Global financial crisis (2007–09)−75.4%−56.5%−$75,390
2018 trade-war selloff−36.0%−20.2%−$35,960
COVID crash (Feb–Mar 2020)−30.5%−34.1%−$30,530
2022 inflation bear market−43.2%−25.4%−$43,180
2025 tariff selloff−45.0%−19.0%−$44,980
WindowLSCC max drawdown
Last 1 year−19.3%
Last 3 years−61.1%
Last 5 years−61.1%
Last 10 years−61.1%

Peak‑to‑trough declines from daily prices inside each crisis window. A crash replay does not predict the next crisis; it shows how much room a holding needs. Run the same replay on a whole portfolio with the crash test.

What moves with LSCC, and what doesn’t

Correlation runs from −1 (moves opposite) to +1 (moves in lockstep). Over the last 60 months of monthly returns, LSCC’s correlation with the S&P 500 was 0.53, with the Nasdaq‑100 0.58, with long Treasuries (TLT) 0.44 and with gold (GLD) 0.12.

Adding a 5% LSCC position to an S&P 500 portfolio would have moved its 5‑year volatility from 15.5% to 16.3%.

Least correlated large capsCorrelationMost correlated large capsCorrelation
COP−0.18ADI0.66
LMT−0.16LRCX0.57
INTU−0.15AMAT0.54
VRTX−0.13INTC0.54
CME−0.13TXN0.54

Holdings that are highly correlated behave like one position in a selloff. See how to find hidden overlap.

Latest LSCC upgrades, downgrades and price‑target changes

DateRating and targetAnalyst
Nov 3Target cut
Buy
Target $150, was $175
Melissa Weathers
Deutsche Bank
Oct 6New coverage
Buy
Sebastien Naji
William Blair

Named analysts’ rating and price‑target changes on LSCC in the 5 weeks to Oct 12, 2026, shown 30 days after publication (the free analysts’ calls 3 days after). The top‑ranked analysts’ calls are in Exent Gems. See all of the latest analyst upgrades and downgrades.

Do analysts get LSCC right?

Of the 209 analyst price targets on LSCC set from 2019 until a year ago, 82.8% were reached within 12 months (data to Oct 20, 2026), 14.2 points above the 68.6% hit rate of the median stock in Exent’s study of 794 stocks. Targets that were reached took a median of 54 days. The median target sat 15.5% above the share price on the day it was set.

Where analysts said LSCC would be by now: a year ago, 9 analysts had a price target on LSCC, and the median of their latest targets was $80.00. On Oct 20, 2026 LSCC closed at $107.41, 34.3% above it.

82.8%of targets reached within 12 monthsMedian stock: 68.6%
54 daysmedian time to reach a target
+34.3%price now vs the median target set a year ago
AfterCallsMove on the call3 months vs S&P 500
Upgrades of LSCC4+13.4%+28.9%
Upgrades, all stocks11,514+2.5%+3.4%

The move on the call runs from the close before the rating change to the close after it; the last column is the stock’s return minus the S&P 500’s over the next three months. Averages of rating changes on LSCC through Sep 15, 2026; analysts are not named here. Do analyst upgrades move stocks?

How LSCC moves after earnings

LSCC beat the consensus earnings‑per‑share estimate in 3 of its last 12 quarterly reports, through the one on Aug 4, 2026, and the revenue estimate in 7 of 12. From the close before each report to the close after it, the stock moved 9.3% on average, up or down, against 6.8% for the average report across the 1,002 US stocks Exent tracks. It rose after 6 of the 12 reports. In 1 of the 3 beats the stock still fell.

3/12earnings beats
±9.3%average move per report
6/12reports followed by a rise
ReportEPS vs estimateRevenue vs estimateStock move
Aug 4, 2026$0.53 vs $0.44+8.4%+0.9%
May 4, 2026$0.41 vs $0.37+3.6%+1.1%
Feb 10, 2026$0.32 vs $0.32+1.8%+20.8%
Nov 3, 2025$0.28 vs $0.28−6.9%−13.3%
Aug 4, 2025$0.24 vs $0.24−5.9%+14.6%
May 5, 2025$0.22 vs $0.22−2.8%−8.3%
Feb 10, 2025$0.19 vs $0.19+0.3%+10.0%
Nov 4, 2024$0.24 vs $0.24+8.5%−2.1%

Reported earnings per share against the consensus estimate, revenue surprise in percent, and the stock’s price change over the two sessions around the report. How stocks move after earnings

Where LSCC’s revenue comes from

In fiscal 2025 (the year to Jan 3, 2026), 31.2% of LSCC’s $877.0 million revenue came from China. By region: Asia 40.3%; China 31.2%; Americas 11.7%; Europe 7.6%.

By business, the largest segment was License and Service, with 100.0% of $17.1 million revenue (−16.3% on the year before).

  • Asia40.3%
  • China31.2%
  • Americas11.7%
  • Europe7.6%
  • Other Asia5.9%
  • Japan3.3%

From LSCC’s annual filings; segment growth compares fiscal 2022 with the year before. Regions are as each company reports them, so one company’s “Asia Pacific” is not another’s. China counts the regions a company reports as China, Greater China or Hong Kong; a separately reported Taiwan is not counted. Which S&P 500 companies depend most on China?

Members of Congress who traded LSCC

As of Oct 20, 2026, 2 members of Congress had disclosed 7 trades in LSCC (3 buys and 4 sales) in STOCK Act disclosures filed with the House and Senate. The latest public trade is dated May 7, 2024.

Trade dateMemberTypeAmount
May 7, 2024Thomas TubervilleSale$1,001–$15,000
Apr 5, 2024Thomas TubervilleBuy$1,001–$15,000
Jan 16, 2018John ReedSale$1,001–$15,000
Jan 12, 2018John ReedSale$1,001–$15,000
Oct 23, 2017John ReedSale$1,001–$15,000
Jun 4, 2015John ReedBuy$1,001–$15,000
Jun 4, 2015John ReedBuy$1,001–$15,000

Amounts are the ranges members report, not exact values. The STOCK Act gives members up to 45 days to disclose a trade, so trades appear weeks after they are made. See every member’s disclosed trades

Are LSCC insiders buying or selling?

In the 12 months to Oct 20, 2026, LSCC insiders made 2 open‑market purchases worth $1.1 million by 1 insider and 68 sales worth $20.2 million, according to SEC Form 4 filings.

After the 9 insider purchases of $10,000 or more since 2012, LSCC beat the S&P 500 by an average of 107.4 percentage points over the next 12 months; every one was followed by a beat. Across all 17,865 insider purchases in Exent’s study, the average was +17.2% and the median +1.0% against the index.

Q1 ’25
Q2 ’25
Q3 ’25
Q4 ’25
Q1 ’26
Q2 ’26
Q3 ’26
Q4 ’26
DateInsiderRoleValue
Nov 7, 2025Tamer FordDirector, officer: President & CEO$255,963
Nov 6, 2025Tamer FordDirector, officer: President & CEO$800,473
May 6, 2022Elashmawi EsamVP Corp, Mktg & Strategy$496,258
May 31, 2019Elashmawi EsamVP Corp, Mktg & Strategy$60,866
May 30, 2019Anderson James RobertDirector, officer: President & CEO$62,300

The table lists the latest open‑market purchases on record, leaving out the last 30 days. The chart counts Form 4 purchases and sales by calendar quarter. Purchases are open‑market buys; sales include planned sales under 10b5‑1 trading plans. Do insider buys beat the market?

How much of LSCC is sold short?

As of the Sep 30, 2026 settlement date, 5.72% of LSCC’s float was sold short: 8.1 million shares, or 4.2 days of average trading volume to cover. A year earlier (Oct 15, 2025) it was 8.88%. The median across the 997 US stocks Exent tracks was 4.77%, so LSCC is more heavily shorted than most.

  • Apr 30, 20263.42%
  • May 29, 20264.44%
  • Jun 30, 20263.57%
  • Jul 31, 20263.45%
  • Aug 31, 20264.09%
  • Sep 30, 20265.72%

From FINRA short‑interest reports, filed twice a month; the bars show the short share of the float at each month‑end. Days to cover divides the shares short by the average daily volume. The most shorted stocks

How many institutions own LSCC?

At the end of Q2 2026 (Jun 30, 2026), 627 institutions reported holding LSCC in 13F filings, up 121 from the quarter before and up from 412 a year earlier. Their reported holdings add up to 105.2% of LSCC’s shares. In the quarter 354 institutions added to their positions and 187 cut them.

62713F holders
156new positions
36positions closed
105.2%of shares held by 13F filers

Investment managers with over $100 million in US equities file 13F reports within 45 days of each quarter end, so this is the latest complete quarter. Holdings can add up to more than 100% when shares are lent and counted twice. Which stocks institutions are buying and selling

Is LSCC diluting shareholders?

LSCC’s diluted share count fell 2.2% over the five fiscal years to fiscal 2025 and fell 0.1% in fiscal 2025 alone. Each share now owns a larger slice of the company. The median change across the 1,005 US stocks Exent tracks was −0.1%.

Stock‑based compensation was $115.6 million in fiscal 2025, 22.1% of revenue. LSCC spent $100.0 million buying back shares, a buyback yield of 0.64% of its market value; stock pay equaled 115.6% of the buybacks.

−0.1%share count, 1 year
−2.2%share count, 5 years
22.1%stock pay as % of revenue
0.64%buyback yield

Weighted‑average diluted shares from LSCC’s annual income statements; stock‑based compensation and buybacks from its cash‑flow statement. Stock dilution and stock‑based compensation, explained

LSCC financial health scores

In Exent’s Oct 20, 2026 snapshot, LSCC’s Altman Z‑score was 50.66, in the safe zone (where 465 of the 794 non‑financial US stocks Exent tracks sit). Its Piotroski F‑score was 8 out of 9; 20% of scored stocks reach 8 or more.

50.66Altman Z‑score: safe zone
8/9Piotroski F‑score

The Altman Z‑score combines five balance‑sheet and earnings ratios into one bankruptcy‑risk score: below 1.81 is the distress zone, 1.81–2.99 grey, above 2.99 safe. It is not meaningful for banks, insurers and REITs. The Piotroski F‑score counts nine yes/no tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency; 8–9 is strong, 0–2 weak. Both come from the latest annual statements. Which stocks have the highest bankruptcy risk?

Which ETFs hold LSCC?

As of Oct 20, 2026, 35 of the 304 ETFs Exent tracks held LSCC. Its largest weight is in PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF), at 2.72% of the fund.

ETFFundWeight of LSCC
PSIInvesco Semiconductors ETF2.72%
QTUMDefiance Quantum ETF1.04%
SOXQInvesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF0.72%
VBKVanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund ETF Shares0.51%
IJHiShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF0.46%
SPMDState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF0.46%
IWPiShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF0.46%
MDYState Street SPDR S&P MIDCAP 400 ETF Trust0.45%

Owning several of these funds stacks the same position. How much do VOO, QQQ and VTI overlap?

The right benchmark for LSCC

Exent matches every holding to the index with the most similar risk. For LSCC that is MDY. Comparing a holding with an index that carries very different risk makes good results look bad and risky ones look clever. Read why the S&P 500 is the wrong benchmark for most portfolios.

Other technology stocks

TickerName5‑year returnVolatility (5y)
AAPLApple Inc.+135.9%28.0%
NVDANVIDIA Corporation+704.3%51.1%
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation+64.0%26.5%
AVGOBroadcom Inc.+570.0%44.7%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.+1,211%51.9%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.+319.9%58.3%
PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc.+611.4%64.4%
ORCLOracle Corporation+45.7%40.4%

Data and methodology

Returns are total returns from month‑end adjusted closing prices (dividends reinvested) through Oct 30, 2026. Crisis drawdowns and trailing maximum drawdowns use daily prices. Analyst coverage counts ratings published in the last 12 months, shown with a 30‑day delay. Full method: Exent methodology.

Company data as of Oct 20, 2026. The move around an earnings report runs from the close before it to the close after it; a price target counts as hit when the stock closed at or beyond it within 12 months (Exent analyst data). Revenue by region and segment, share counts and executive pay come from company filings; insider trades from SEC Form 4, short interest from FINRA, institutional ownership from 13F filings, Congress trades from STOCK Act disclosures filed with the House and Senate, federal contracts from USAspending.gov. Filings from the last 30 days are shown as counts only.

Past performance does not guarantee future results. Historical figures are calculated by Exent from market data and are for education only; they are not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security.

Check LSCC with Exent Gems

Wall Street’s average LSCC price target is 60.1% above the latest share price. See what the best‑ranked analysts on LSCC say now in Exent Gems.

  1. Exent ranks Wall Street analysts by their past price‑target hit rate and returns, and keeps the best‑ranked few.
  2. Gems shows who the top‑ranked analysts covering LSCC are, their live calls and the median target of only the top‑rated analysts.
  3. Gems flags the stocks where several top‑ranked analysts agree: a starting point for your own research, not a promise.

Exent is our product. Educational content, not investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Yes. LSCC returned +1,432% (+31.4% a year) over the 10 years to Oct 30, 2026, versus +316.3% (+15.3% a year) for the S&P 500, including dividends.

No. As of Oct 20, 2026, LSCC (Lattice Semiconductor Corporation) is not one of the 503 stocks in the S&P 500.

No. As of Oct 20, 2026, LSCC (Lattice Semiconductor Corporation) is not one of the 101 stocks in the Nasdaq-100.

LSCC fell −75.4% from peak to trough during the global financial crisis (2007–09), versus −56.5% for the S&P 500.

LSCC fell −30.5% from peak to trough during the covid crash (feb–mar 2020), versus −34.1% for the S&P 500.

LSCC fell −43.2% from peak to trough during the 2022 inflation bear market, versus −25.4% for the S&P 500.

Over the 5 years to Oct 30, 2026, LSCC’s Sharpe ratio was 0.31 and its Sortino ratio 0.49, versus 0.58 and 0.91 for the S&P 500.

LSCC’s 5‑year annualized volatility was 53.8%, higher than the S&P 500’s 17.0%, with a beta of 1.90.

Among large US stocks, the lowest correlations with LSCC over the last 60 months were COP (−0.18), LMT (−0.16), INTU (−0.15). Its correlation with long Treasuries (TLT) was 0.44 and with gold (GLD) 0.12.

LSCC beat the consensus earnings-per-share estimate in 3 of its last 12 quarterly reports through Aug 4, 2026, and the revenue estimate in 7 of 12. The stock moved 9.3% on average, up or down, from the close before each report to the close after it.

In fiscal 2025 (the year to Jan 3, 2026), 31.2% of LSCC’s $877.0 million revenue came from China, about $273.6 million. Regions are as LSCC reports them in its annual filings.

Yes. As of Oct 20, 2026, 2 members of Congress had disclosed 7 trades in LSCC (3 buys and 4 sales) in STOCK Act disclosures filed with the House and Senate.

As of the Sep 30, 2026 settlement date, 5.72% of LSCC’s float was sold short (8.1 million shares, 4.2 days to cover), according to FINRA short-interest reports. A year earlier it was 8.88%.

No. LSCC’s diluted share count fell 2.2% over the five fiscal years to fiscal 2025 and fell 0.1% in the latest year. Stock-based compensation was 22.1% of revenue, and buybacks totaled $100.0 million.

What do the best‑ranked analysts say on LSCC now?

Exent ranks Wall Street analysts by their track record. Gems shows who the top‑ranked analysts on LSCC are, their latest calls and the stocks where several of them agree.

See this week’s GemsLimited offer$1.95 for full access· full access

Educational content, not investment advice. Examples are illustrative; past performance does not guarantee future results.

DISCLAIMER: Exent AI is an informational research platform and does not provide investment advice, financial advice, or act as an investment adviser, broker-dealer, or fiduciary. All content, analytics, and model outputs are provided for educational and informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any financial instrument. Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. Exent AI does not execute trades, hold customer funds, or provide brokerage services. Past performance and hypothetical results are not indicative of future results. Third-party data and AI-generated outputs may be incomplete or inaccurate.