AnalystsInsight

Best Energy Analysts on Wall Street: Track Records Ranked

Exent ranks 63 energy analysts among Wall Street’s 1,000 by price‑target hit rate, returns after their calls and number of ratings, from a 7‑year backtest. How the sector’s analysts do, and who ranks below the members‑only top 50.

Published Updated 3 min readHow we research

Key takeaways

  • 63 of the 1,000 analysts Exent ranks cover energy mainly; their median price‑target hit rate is 51.1% (all analysts: 52.4%).
  • A median 66.3% of their calls were up 12 months later; targets that were hit took a median 103 days.
  • The top 50 energy analysts and their live calls are members‑only in Exent Gems; 13 more have free profiles below.

How accurate are energy analysts?

Median across the sector’s analystsEnergyAll analysts
Price‑target hit rate51.1%52.4%
Calls up after 12 months66.3%64.0%
Median 12‑month return of calls+15.1%+13.4%
Median days to hit target103 days91 days

The top‑ranked energy analysts

The top 50 energy analysts are the ones Exent Gems follows in this sector. Who they are and what they are rating now is for members; their records are below.

Sector rankAnalystFirmStarsHit rate
#15.0★39.2%
#25.0★0.0%
#35.0★71.1%
#45.0★—
#55.0★—
#65.0★44.3%
#75.0★45.3%
#85.0★54.1%
#95.0★—
#105.0★51.6%
  • #1
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    5.0★
    Hit rate
    39.2%
  • #2
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    5.0★
    Hit rate
    0.0%
  • #3
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    5.0★
    Hit rate
    71.1%
  • #4
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    5.0★
    Hit rate
    —
  • #5
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    5.0★
    Hit rate
    —
  • #6
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    5.0★
    Hit rate
    44.3%
  • #7
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    5.0★
    Hit rate
    45.3%
  • #8
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    5.0★
    Hit rate
    54.1%
  • #9
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    5.0★
    Hit rate
    —
  • #10
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    5.0★
    Hit rate
    51.6%

Energy analysts ranked 51 and below

Sector rankAnalystFirmStarsHit rateNewest ratings
#51Andreas NygardNordea Markets4.7★10.0%After 3 days
#52Pei Hwa HoDBS4.7★13.3%After 3 days
#53Spiro M. DounisCiti4.7★46.8%After 3 days
#54Arun JayaramJ.P. Morgan4.7★53.8%After 3 days
#55Michele Della VignaGoldman Sachs4.7★16.7%After 3 days
#56Doug LeggateWolfe Research4.7★40.2%After 3 days
#57Victoria MccullochRBC Capital4.6★75.0%After 3 days
#58Guillaume DelabyBernstein4.5★53.3%After 3 days
#59Subash ChandraBenchmark Co.4.5★50.0%After 3 days
#60Alex BrooksCanaccord Genuity4.5★—After 3 days
#61Derek PodhaizerPiper Sandler4.5★62.8%After 3 days
#62David AndersonBarclays4.4★59.3%After 3 days
#63Dim AriyasingheUBS3.9★—After 3 days
  • #51
    Firm
    Nordea Markets
    Stars
    4.7★
    Hit rate
    10.0%
    Newest ratings
    After 3 days
  • #52
    Analyst
    Pei Hwa Ho
    Firm
    DBS
    Stars
    4.7★
    Hit rate
    13.3%
    Newest ratings
    After 3 days
  • #53
    Firm
    Citi
    Stars
    4.7★
    Hit rate
    46.8%
    Newest ratings
    After 3 days
  • #54
    Firm
    J.P. Morgan
    Stars
    4.7★
    Hit rate
    53.8%
    Newest ratings
    After 3 days
  • #55
    Firm
    Goldman Sachs
    Stars
    4.7★
    Hit rate
    16.7%
    Newest ratings
    After 3 days
  • #56
    Firm
    Wolfe Research
    Stars
    4.7★
    Hit rate
    40.2%
    Newest ratings
    After 3 days
  • #57
    Firm
    RBC Capital
    Stars
    4.6★
    Hit rate
    75.0%
    Newest ratings
    After 3 days
  • #58
    Firm
    Bernstein
    Stars
    4.5★
    Hit rate
    53.3%
    Newest ratings
    After 3 days
  • #59
    Firm
    Benchmark Co.
    Stars
    4.5★
    Hit rate
    50.0%
    Newest ratings
    After 3 days
  • #60
    Firm
    Canaccord Genuity
    Stars
    4.5★
    Hit rate
    —
    Newest ratings
    After 3 days
  • #61
    Firm
    Piper Sandler
    Stars
    4.5★
    Hit rate
    62.8%
    Newest ratings
    After 3 days
  • #62
    Firm
    Barclays
    Stars
    4.4★
    Hit rate
    59.3%
    Newest ratings
    After 3 days
  • #63
    Firm
    UBS
    Stars
    3.9★
    Hit rate
    —
    Newest ratings
    After 3 days

How analysts are ranked

Every rating with a price target over a 7‑year lookback is replayed: was the target reached, how fast, and what the stock returned 1, 3, 6 and 12 months later. The ranking combines success rate, average return and number of ratings; the sector rank orders the analysts whose main sector is energy. Sector figures are medians, so one star analyst does not carry the group. All sectors and the overall ranking.

Past performance does not guarantee future results. Historical figures are calculated by Exent from market data and are for education only; they are not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security.

Frequently asked questions

In Exent’s ranking, the top energy analyst reached 39.2% of price targets over a 7-year lookback, against a 51.1% median for the sector. The names and live calls of the top 50 energy analysts are members-only in Exent Gems (exent.ai/radar).

Across the 63 energy analysts in Exent’s ranking, the median price-target hit rate was 51.1% over a 7-year lookback, against 52.4% for all analysts, and a median 66.3% of their calls were up 12 months later.

Get the picks Wall Street’s best analysts agree on.

Exent tracks 4,000+ analysts, keeps only the elite few with proven records, and surfaces the Gems where they agree.

See this week’s GemsLimited offer$1.95 for full access· full access

Educational content, not investment advice. Examples are illustrative; past performance does not guarantee future results.

DISCLAIMER: Exent AI is an informational research platform and does not provide investment advice, financial advice, or act as an investment adviser, broker-dealer, or fiduciary. All content, analytics, and model outputs are provided for educational and informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any financial instrument. Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. Exent AI does not execute trades, hold customer funds, or provide brokerage services. Past performance and hypothetical results are not indicative of future results. Third-party data and AI-generated outputs may be incomplete or inaccurate.