How Can I Beat the S&P 500? What the Evidence Says
The honest answer to the most asked question in investing: how many people beat the index, why it is so hard, why investors trail even their own funds, and how daily market context fits in.
StocksInsight
TRI Stock vs the S&P 500: Returns, Risk and Crash History
Thomson Reuters Corporation, industrials (market value $46.9 billion), a Nasdaq‑100 member: how it compared with the S&P 500, how it behaved in every crash since 2008, its risk‑adjusted returns and what analysts said. Data as of Sep 30, 2026.
Key takeaways
- TRI returned −4.6% over the 5 years to Sep 30, 2026 versus +90.0% for the S&P 500: it lagged the index.
- Its 5-year Sharpe ratio was −0.05 against 0.67 for the S&P 500.
- Its deepest crisis drawdown was −57.7% in the global financial crisis (2007–09) (S&P 500: −56.5%).
- Five‑year volatility was 25.5% and beta 0.77.
In this article
- Did TRI beat the S&P 500?
- TRI returns by year vs the S&P 500
- TRI risk-adjusted returns: Sharpe, Sortino and volatility
- How TRI behaved in past crashes
- What moves with TRI, and what doesn’t
- What Wall Street analysts say about TRI
- Latest TRI upgrades, downgrades and price‑target changes
- The right benchmark for TRI
- Other industrials stocks
- Data and methodology
Did TRI beat the S&P 500?
Over the 5 years to Sep 30, 2026, Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) returned −4.6% including dividends, versus +90.0% for the S&P 500 (SPY). It lagged the index by 94.6 percentage points, or −0.9% a year against +13.7%.
| Period | TRI | S&P 500 | TRI per year | S&P 500 per year | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 year | −35.7% | +15.7% | −35.7% | +15.7% | Lagged |
| 3 years | −16.2% | +85.0% | −5.7% | +22.8% | Lagged |
| 5 years | −4.6% | +90.0% | −0.9% | +13.7% | Lagged |
| 10 years | +183.9% | +312.9% | +11.0% | +15.2% | Lagged |
- 1 year
- TRI
- −35.7%
- S&P 500
- +15.7%
- TRI per year
- −35.7%
- S&P 500 per year
- +15.7%
- Result
- Lagged
- 3 years
- TRI
- −16.2%
- S&P 500
- +85.0%
- TRI per year
- −5.7%
- S&P 500 per year
- +22.8%
- Result
- Lagged
- 5 years
- TRI
- −4.6%
- S&P 500
- +90.0%
- TRI per year
- −0.9%
- S&P 500 per year
- +13.7%
- Result
- Lagged
- 10 years
- TRI
- +183.9%
- S&P 500
- +312.9%
- TRI per year
- +11.0%
- S&P 500 per year
- +15.2%
- Result
- Lagged
Total return with dividends reinvested, from month-end prices to Sep 30, 2026. Beating the index on raw return is only half the story: the next section adjusts for the risk taken. See also how to beat the S&P 500.
TRI is in the Nasdaq‑100 (members as of Oct 20, 2026); the list shows every member’s return against the index.
TRI returns by year vs the S&P 500
TRI beat the S&P 500 in 5 of the 9 full calendar years shown.
| Year | TRI | S&P 500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to Sep 30, 2026) | −24.6% | +12.7% | −37.3% |
| 2025 | −16.6% | +17.7% | −34.3% |
| 2024 | +11.1% | +24.9% | −13.8% |
| 2023 | +29.8% | +26.2% | +3.6% |
| 2022 | −3.1% | −18.2% | +15.1% |
| 2021 | +48.3% | +28.7% | +19.6% |
| 2020 | +16.6% | +18.3% | −1.7% |
| 2019 | +51.4% | +31.2% | +20.2% |
| 2018 | +13.3% | −4.6% | +17.9% |
| 2017 | +2.2% | +21.7% | −19.5% |
TRI risk-adjusted returns: Sharpe, Sortino and volatility
Over 5 years, TRI had a Sharpe ratio of −0.05 against 0.67 for the S&P 500, so it earned less return per unit of risk than the index. Its annualized volatility was 25.8% and its beta 0.77: it tended to move about 0.8× as much as the market.
| Metric | TRI | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Annual return | −0.9% | +13.7% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.8% | 15.7% |
| Sharpe ratio | −0.05 | 0.67 |
| Sortino ratio | −0.07 | 1.08 |
| Max drawdown (month-end) | −58.5% | −23.9% |
| Beta to the S&P 500 | 0.77 | 1.00 |
Sharpe divides return above cash by total volatility; Sortino counts only downside volatility. Both use monthly returns and the 1–3 month T‑bill ETF (BIL) as the risk‑free rate.
How TRI behaved in past crashes
TRI’s deepest fall in the crises below was −57.7% in the global financial crisis (2007–09), against −56.5% for the S&P 500. The last column turns that into money: what a $100,000 position would have lost from peak to trough.
| Crisis | TRI | S&P 500 | Loss on $100,000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global financial crisis (2007–09) | −57.7% | −56.5% | −$57,690 |
| 2018 trade-war selloff | −13.7% | −20.2% | −$13,700 |
| COVID crash (Feb–Mar 2020) | −35.7% | −34.1% | −$35,690 |
| 2022 inflation bear market | −21.0% | −25.4% | −$20,980 |
| 2025 tariff selloff | −10.0% | −19.0% | −$9,970 |
| Window | TRI max drawdown |
|---|---|
| Last 1 year | −62.6% |
| Last 3 years | −62.6% |
| Last 5 years | −62.6% |
| Last 10 years | −62.3% |
Peak‑to‑trough declines from daily prices inside each crisis window. A crash replay does not predict the next crisis; it shows how much room a holding needs. Run the same replay on a whole portfolio with the crash test.
What moves with TRI, and what doesn’t
Correlation runs from −1 (moves opposite) to +1 (moves in lockstep). Over the last 60 months of monthly returns, TRI’s correlation with the S&P 500 was 0.47, with the Nasdaq‑100 0.40, with long Treasuries (TLT) 0.30 and with gold (GLD) −0.01.
Adding a 5% TRI position to an S&P 500 portfolio would have moved its 5‑year volatility from 15.7% to 15.5%.
| Least correlated large caps | Correlation | Most correlated large caps | Correlation |
|---|---|---|---|
| GLW | −0.25 | MSFT | 0.69 |
| MU | −0.16 | INTU | 0.65 |
| LMT | −0.13 | SPGI | 0.65 |
| WDC | −0.11 | ADP | 0.62 |
| MO | −0.09 | MCO | 0.62 |
Holdings that are highly correlated behave like one position in a selloff. See how to find hidden overlap.
What Wall Street analysts say about TRI
The consensus 12‑month price target was $137.67 (range $87.00–$183.00), +19.4% from the last price. Remember that the average analyst’s target is hit only about half the time: how accurate are price targets?
Ratings are shown with a 30‑day delay. Who the top‑ranked analysts on TRI are, their live calls and the median target of only the top‑rated analysts are in Exent Gems.
Latest TRI upgrades, downgrades and price‑target changes
No named analyst changed a rating or price target on TRI in the 5 weeks to Sep 22, 2026 (calls are shown 30 days after publication). The top‑ranked analysts’ calls are in Exent Gems. See all of the latest analyst upgrades and downgrades.
The right benchmark for TRI
Exent matches every holding to the index with the most similar risk. For TRI that is SPY (the S&P 500). Comparing a holding with an index that carries very different risk makes good results look bad and risky ones look clever. Read why the S&P 500 is the wrong benchmark for most portfolios.
Other industrials stocks
Data and methodology
Returns are total returns from month‑end adjusted closing prices (dividends reinvested) through Sep 30, 2026. Crisis drawdowns and trailing maximum drawdowns use daily prices. Analyst coverage counts ratings published in the last 12 months, shown with a 30‑day delay. Full method: Exent methodology.
Company data as of Oct 20, 2026. The move around an earnings report runs from the close before it to the close after it; a price target counts as hit when the stock closed at or beyond it within 12 months (Exent analyst data). Revenue by region and segment, share counts and executive pay come from company filings; insider trades from SEC Form 4, short interest from FINRA, institutional ownership from 13F filings, Congress trades from STOCK Act disclosures filed with the House and Senate, federal contracts from USAspending.gov. Filings from the last 30 days are shown as counts only.
Past performance does not guarantee future results. Historical figures are calculated by Exent from market data and are for education only; they are not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
See what TRI does to your own portfolio
- Upload a screenshot of your holdings (or a CSV, Excel, PDF or Google Sheet); no brokerage login.
- Exent replays your whole portfolio, TRI included, through the 2008, 2018, 2020, 2022 and 2025 selloffs and shows which holdings drive the losses.
- It finds holdings that move together with TRI and compares your portfolio with a risk‑matched benchmark, Sharpe and Sortino included.
- Use the what‑if simulator to change weights and see the effect before you trade.
Frequently asked questions
No. TRI returned +183.9% (+11.0% a year) over the 10 years to Sep 30, 2026, versus +312.9% (+15.2% a year) for the S&P 500, including dividends.
No. As of Oct 20, 2026, TRI (Thomson Reuters Corporation) is not one of the 503 stocks in the S&P 500. It is in the Nasdaq-100.
Yes. As of Oct 20, 2026, TRI (Thomson Reuters Corporation) is one of the 101 stocks in the Nasdaq-100.
TRI fell −57.7% from peak to trough during the global financial crisis (2007–09), versus −56.5% for the S&P 500.
TRI fell −35.7% from peak to trough during the covid crash (feb–mar 2020), versus −34.1% for the S&P 500.
TRI fell −21.0% from peak to trough during the 2022 inflation bear market, versus −25.4% for the S&P 500.
Over the 5 years to Sep 30, 2026, TRI’s Sharpe ratio was −0.05 and its Sortino ratio −0.07, versus 0.67 and 1.08 for the S&P 500.
TRI’s 5‑year annualized volatility was 25.5%, higher than the S&P 500’s 17.0%, with a beta of 0.77.
Among large US stocks, the lowest correlations with TRI over the last 60 months were GLW (−0.25), MU (−0.16), LMT (−0.13). Its correlation with long Treasuries (TLT) was 0.30 and with gold (GLD) −0.01.
What would TRI do to your portfolio?
Exent replays your whole portfolio through the same crashes, finds holdings that move together and compares you with a risk‑matched benchmark. Upload a screenshot; results in about a minute.
Check my portfolioLimited offer$1.95 for unlimited checks· unlimited checks
Educational content, not investment advice. Examples are illustrative; past performance does not guarantee future results.