How Can I Beat the S&P 500? What the Evidence Says
The honest answer to the most asked question in investing: how many people beat the index, why it is so hard, why investors trail even their own funds, and how daily market context fits in.
ETFsInsight
CGGR ETF vs the S&P 500: Returns, Risk and Crash History
Capital Group Growth ETF (market value $25.4 billion): how it compared with the S&P 500, how it behaved in every crash since 2008, its risk‑adjusted returns. Data as of Oct 30, 2026.
What changed since Oct 26
Exent re-checks this page every day.
+1.9% 1‑year return through Oct 30 (was +8.2%)
Key takeaways
- CGGR returned +93.2% over the 3 years to Oct 30, 2026 versus +87.4% for the S&P 500: it beat the index.
- Its 3-year Sharpe ratio was 1.13 against 1.43 for the S&P 500.
- Its deepest crisis drawdown was −23.0% in the 2025 tariff selloff (S&P 500: −19.0%).
- Five‑year volatility was 21.5% and beta 1.30.
What is your own portfolio exposed to? Check it with Exent →
Did CGGR beat the S&P 500?
Over the 3 years to Oct 30, 2026, Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) returned +93.2% including dividends, versus +87.4% for the S&P 500 (SPY). It beat the index by 5.8 percentage points, or +24.6% a year against +23.3%.
| Period | CGGR | S&P 500 | CGGR per year | S&P 500 per year | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 year | +1.9% | +12.0% | +1.9% | +12.0% | Lagged |
| 3 years | +93.2% | +87.4% | +24.6% | +23.3% | Beat |
| Period | 1 year | 3 years |
|---|---|---|
| CGGR | +1.9% | +93.2% |
| S&P 500 | +12.0% | +87.4% |
| CGGR per year | +1.9% | +24.6% |
| S&P 500 per year | +12.0% | +23.3% |
| Result | Lagged | Beat |
Total return with dividends reinvested, from month-end prices to Oct 30, 2026. Beating the index on raw return is only half the story: the next section adjusts for the risk taken. See also how to beat the S&P 500.
CGGR returns by year vs the S&P 500
CGGR beat the S&P 500 in 3 of the 3 full calendar years shown.
| Year | CGGR | S&P 500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (to Oct 30, 2026) | +2.7% | +11.7% | −9.0% |
| 2025 | +19.8% | +17.7% | +2.1% |
| 2024 | +32.1% | +24.9% | +7.2% |
| 2023 | +42.2% | +26.2% | +16.0% |
CGGR risk-adjusted returns: Sharpe, Sortino and volatility
Over 3 years, CGGR had a Sharpe ratio of 1.13 against 1.43 for the S&P 500, so it earned less return per unit of risk than the index. Its annualized volatility was 17.0% and its beta 1.30: it tended to move about 1.3× as much as the market.
| Metric | CGGR | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Annual return | +24.6% | +23.3% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0% | 12.3% |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.13 | 1.43 |
| Sortino ratio | 2.12 | 3.02 |
| Max drawdown (month-end) | −12.9% | −7.6% |
| Beta to the S&P 500 | 1.30 | 1.00 |
Sharpe divides return above cash by total volatility; Sortino counts only downside volatility. Both use monthly returns and the 1–3 month T‑bill ETF (BIL) as the risk‑free rate.
How CGGR behaved in past crashes
CGGR’s deepest fall in the crises below was −23.0% in the 2025 tariff selloff, against −19.0% for the S&P 500. The last column turns that into money: what a $100,000 position would have lost from peak to trough.
| Crisis | CGGR | S&P 500 | Loss on $100,000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 tariff selloff | −23.0% | −19.0% | −$23,020 |
| Window | CGGR max drawdown |
|---|---|
| Last 1 year | −15.0% |
| Last 3 years | −23.4% |
| Last 5 years | −28.9% |
| Last 10 years | −29.0% |
Peak‑to‑trough declines from daily prices inside each crisis window. A crash replay does not predict the next crisis; it shows how much room a holding needs. Run the same replay on a whole portfolio with the crash test.
What moves with CGGR, and what doesn’t
Correlation runs from −1 (moves opposite) to +1 (moves in lockstep). Over the last 36 months of monthly returns, CGGR’s correlation with the S&P 500 was 0.94, with the Nasdaq‑100 0.93, with long Treasuries (TLT) 0.30 and with gold (GLD) 0.02.
| Least correlated large caps | Correlation | Most correlated large caps | Correlation |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOM | −0.49 | HOOD | 0.70 |
| COP | −0.40 | MS | 0.68 |
| EOG | −0.35 | IBKR | 0.67 |
| CVX | −0.28 | ANET | 0.66 |
| LMT | −0.23 | DIS | 0.65 |
Holdings that are highly correlated behave like one position in a selloff. See how to find hidden overlap.
What does CGGR hold?
As of Oct 20, 2026, CGGR held 95 positions; its 10 largest made up 40.3% of the fund. The largest was META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) at 6.63%.
| Holding | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| META | Meta Platforms, Inc. | 6.63% |
| MSFT | Microsoft Corporation | 4.87% |
| NVDA | NVIDIA Corporation | 4.67% |
| AVGO | Broadcom Inc. | 4.21% |
| TSLA | Tesla, Inc. | 4.09% |
| V | Visa Inc. | 3.58% |
| GOOG | Alphabet Inc Cl C Common Stock Usd.001 | 3.28% |
| GOOGL | Alphabet Inc. | 3.15% |
| AAPL | Apple Inc. | 2.92% |
| MU | Micron Technology, Inc. | 2.87% |
From the fund’s latest published holdings. Overlap by weight adds up, for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of its two weights: 100% would mean the same portfolio. How much do VOO, QQQ and VTI overlap?
The right benchmark for CGGR
Exent matches every holding to the index with the most similar risk. For CGGR that is SPY (the S&P 500). Comparing a holding with an index that carries very different risk makes good results look bad and risky ones look clever. Read why the S&P 500 is the wrong benchmark for most portfolios.
Other popular ETFs
| Ticker | Name | 5‑year return | Volatility (5y) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPCX | SPAC and New Issue ETF | +455.5% | 8.3% |
| VTI | Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares | +68.1% | 17.4% |
| VOO | Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | +76.5% | 16.8% |
| IVV | iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | +76.5% | 16.9% |
| SPY | State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust | +75.9% | 17.0% |
| 1557.T | SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust | +78.6% | 20.7% |
| VXUS | Vanguard Total Intl Stock Idx Fund | +47.5% | 16.0% |
| QQQ | Invesco QQQ Trust | +84.3% | 22.3% |
Data and methodology
Returns are total returns from month‑end adjusted closing prices (dividends reinvested) through Oct 30, 2026. Crisis drawdowns and trailing maximum drawdowns use daily prices. Analyst coverage counts ratings published in the last 12 months, shown with a 30‑day delay. Full method: Exent methodology.
Holdings and weights are the fund’s latest published holdings; ETF overlap compares those holdings stock by stock.
Past performance does not guarantee future results. Historical figures are calculated by Exent from market data and are for education only; they are not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
See what CGGR does to your own portfolio
- Upload a screenshot of your holdings (or a CSV, Excel, PDF or Google Sheet); no brokerage login.
- Exent replays your whole portfolio, CGGR included, through the 2008, 2018, 2020, 2022 and 2025 selloffs and shows which holdings drive the losses.
- It finds holdings that move together with CGGR and compares your portfolio with a risk‑matched benchmark, Sharpe and Sortino included.
- Use the what‑if simulator to change weights and see the effect before you trade.
Frequently asked questions
Over the 3 years to Oct 30, 2026, CGGR’s Sharpe ratio was 1.13 and its Sortino ratio 2.12, versus 1.43 and 3.02 for the S&P 500.
CGGR’s 5‑year annualized volatility was 21.5%, higher than the S&P 500’s 17.0%, with a beta of 1.30.
Among large US stocks, the lowest correlations with CGGR over the last 36 months were XOM (−0.49), COP (−0.40), EOG (−0.35). Its correlation with long Treasuries (TLT) was 0.30 and with gold (GLD) 0.02.
What would CGGR do to your portfolio?
Exent replays your whole portfolio through the same crashes, finds holdings that move together and compares you with a risk‑matched benchmark. Upload a screenshot; results in about a minute.
Check my portfolioLimited offer$1.95 for unlimited checks· unlimited checks
Educational content, not investment advice. Examples are illustrative; past performance does not guarantee future results.