Is a Financial Advisor Worth 1%? Exent vs an Advisor
What a 1% advisory fee costs over 10, 20 and 30 years, what the fee actually pays for, and how Exent gives you a full analysis of your portfolio for a flat subscription.
A second opinion on a portfolio someone else manages comes down to two questions: what you pay in total, and whether the portfolio is built the way it was described to you. Here is a checklist for both.
Get a recent statement with every holding and its value, then check the cost and the structure separately. Cost is what you pay each year, in dollars. Structure is how much risk the portfolio really takes, compared with what you agreed to.
You do not need to second-guess every fund choice. You are looking for mismatches: a “moderate” portfolio that fell like an all-stock one, five funds that own the same companies, or fees that add up to more than you realized. The same checks apply to a robo-advisor, a bank wealth account or a portfolio a relative set up for you.
Usually more than the headline fee, because fund expenses come on top of the advisory fee and are taken inside the fund, so they never appear as a line on your statement. An illustrative fee stack on $500,000:
| Illustrative setup | Advisory fee | Fund expenses | Total per year | On $500,000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advisor using active funds | 1.00% | 0.50% | 1.50% | $7,500 |
| Advisor using index funds | 1.00% | 0.05% | 1.05% | $5,250 |
| Robo-advisor | 0.25% | 0.10% | 0.35% | $1,750 |
| Index funds, no adviser | 0% | 0.05% | 0.05% | $250 |
Illustrative rates, not quotes from any firm. Over time the gap compounds. At an illustrative 7% a year before costs, $500,000 grows to about $1,935,000 in 20 years, against about $1,459,000 with 1.5% a year taken out. Try your own numbers in the fee drag calculator, and see how to check fund fees.
Compare the actual holdings with the risk level on paper. Count every stock fund, including “balanced” and target-date funds, by what they hold. Then replay a crash. In Exent’s data, as of Sep 30, 2026, the S&P 500 fell 34.1% peak to trough in the 2020 COVID crash. On an illustrative $500,000 with 70% in broad US stocks, that is about $119,000 from the stock part alone.
If that number surprises you, the portfolio may be riskier than the label suggests. Also check for overlap. Several large-cap funds often hold the same top companies. Our ETF overlap tool shows how much.
Work from the statement, not a login. A recent statement or a holdings export is enough for every check above: fees, the real stock and bond split, overlap, concentration, a crash replay and a fair benchmark. A spreadsheet handles most of it. Keep the review about numbers, not about the person. If the review raises questions, take them to the adviser first, or to a fee-only planner for an independent view. For the bigger decision, see how to evaluate a financial advisor.
Compare your results with a simple index mix at the same risk level, after all fees. Then check whether the portfolio matches the risk you agreed to and whether the planning help justifies the cost.
Total fees in dollars, the real stock and bond split, overlap between funds, concentration, crash losses in past downturns and a fair benchmark.
Add the advisory fee to the expense ratio of each fund you hold, weighted by its size. Your Form CRS and Form ADV brochure describe the adviser’s fees.
Yes. Robo-advisors usually charge less, but the same checks apply: total cost, allocation against your risk setting, overlap and crash losses in dollars.
Use the SEC’s Investment Adviser Public Disclosure site for registered advisers and FINRA BrokerCheck for brokers. Both are free.
Upload a screenshot of your holdings and get concentration, overlap, crash exposure and a risk-matched benchmark in about a minute.
Educational content, not investment advice. Examples are illustrative; past performance does not guarantee future results.