Is a Financial Advisor Worth 1%? Exent vs an Advisor
What a 1% advisory fee costs over 10, 20 and 30 years, what the fee actually pays for, and how Exent gives you a full analysis of your portfolio for a flat subscription.
Leaving an advisor can save thousands a year, but only if you replace what the advisor actually did. Here is a decision checklist, what doing it yourself takes, and how to manage the first months on your own.
It can make sense if what you mainly paid for was choosing investments, and you are willing to do the routine work yourself. It makes less sense if the advisor handles complex taxes, retirement income, an estate or a business, or if they are the reason you did not sell in the last crash.
The decision is not “advisor good” or “advisor bad”. It is whether the services you actually use are worth the fee to you. Write down what your advisor did for you in the past year. If the list is “picked funds and sent statements”, software and a simple index portfolio can cover most of it.
The fee is charged on the whole balance every year, so its cost compounds. Illustrative: $500,000 earning 7% a year before fees, with and without a 1% advisory fee.
| Years | No advisory fee (7%) | After a 1% fee (6%) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $984,000 | $895,000 | $88,000 |
| 20 | $1,935,000 | $1,604,000 | $331,000 |
| 30 | $3,806,000 | $2,872,000 | $934,000 |
Illustrative, rounded, ignoring taxes and fund expenses; not a forecast. The other side of the ledger is behavior. In Exent’s data, as of Sep 30, 2026, the S&P 500 fell 34.1% peak to trough in the 2020 COVID crash: about $170,000 on an illustrative $500,000 in stocks. If selling at that point is likely, the fee savings can disappear in a single bad decision. Compare the trade-offs in is a financial advisor worth 1%?
| What the advisor did | What replaces it when you DIY |
|---|---|
| Chose investments | A simple core of low-cost index funds, plus any individual stocks you size on purpose |
| Rebalanced | A written rule and a calendar reminder |
| Monitored risk | A quarterly check of concentration, overlap and crash loss in dollars |
| Tax planning | A CPA or enrolled agent, paid by the hour or per return |
| Retirement income and estate | A fee-only planner, hired per project |
| Talked you out of panic | A written plan you read before acting in a downturn |
The index core matters. In Exent’s data, only 152 of the 422 large US stocks with 10 years of history beat the S&P 500 index over that period, and the list leaves out companies that shrank or disappeared, which flatters the result. See robo-advisor vs advisor vs DIY.
Replace the advisor’s risk review with a regular check-up. Each quarter, check concentration, overlap between funds, a crash replay in dollars and the result against a benchmark with similar risk. Rebalance only when an allocation has drifted past the range you wrote down. Use our portfolio health check as the quarterly routine. If you still want an advisor for specific questions, check their record on FINRA BrokerCheck first.
It can be if you mainly paid for investment selection and you will follow a written plan on your own. If the advisor handles complex taxes, retirement income or keeps you from panic selling, the fee may be worth it.
On $500,000 it is $5,000 in the first year. Illustratively, at 7% a year before fees, it leaves about $331,000 less after 20 years.
A target allocation, low-cost funds for the core, a rebalancing rule, a quarterly risk check and a written plan for downturns. Pay specialists separately for taxes or estate questions.
Moving accounts in kind usually does not trigger taxes. Selling holdings in a taxable account can, so check with a tax professional before making changes.
Yes. Many fee-only planners work hourly or per project, which lets you manage the investments yourself and pay only for the advice you use.
Upload a screenshot of your holdings and get concentration, overlap, crash exposure and a risk-matched benchmark in about a minute.
Educational content, not investment advice. Examples are illustrative; past performance does not guarantee future results.