Is My Portfolio Diversified Enough? 4 Tests to Run
Owning many tickers is not the same as owning many bets. Four quick tests, with rule-of-thumb thresholds, show whether your portfolio is really diversified and balanced.
The risks that hurt most are the ones you did not know you held. Here are the five that hide in ordinary portfolios, and how to find each one.
Often, yes. Funds weighted by market value hold the same large companies at the top. By weight, the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and the Invesco QQQ Trust share about 54% of their holdings, and VOO and the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) share about 88%, according to ETF Research Center (read Oct 12, 2026). Owning both of a heavily overlapping pair adds a ticker, not much diversification. Common pairs are compared in ETF overlap: common pairs, and the method in ETF overlap.
Stocks in the same industry, or exposed to the same driver, tend to move together. Their names differ; their risk does not.
| Cluster (Exent’s data, 60 months to Sep 30, 2026) | Correlation | Shared driver |
|---|---|---|
| Applied Materials, KLA, Lam Research | 0.86 to 0.93 | Semiconductor capital spending |
| JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America | 0.89 | Rates and credit |
| Exxon Mobil and Chevron | 0.87 | Oil prices |
| Alphabet and Amazon | 0.68 | Ad and cloud spending, growth sentiment |
Sized one by one, each of these looks reasonable. Added up, a cluster can be a third of the portfolio. Treat each cluster as one position when you think about size. The method is in how to check if your stocks are correlated.
Factors are broad traits that drive groups of stocks: growth vs value, size, momentum, sensitivity to interest rates. A portfolio of fast‑growing tech, software and consumer names is, underneath, a bet that growth stocks keep their premium and rates stay friendly.
2022 showed what that bet costs when it turns. In the same data, the S&P 500 Growth index fund (IVW) returned −29.5% for the year and the Nasdaq‑100 (QQQ) −32.6%, while the S&P 500 Value fund (IVE) returned −5.4% and the S&P 500 −18.2%. Same index family, very different outcomes. You can spot a tilt by asking what your top holdings have in common beyond their sector. See factor exposure.
A small number of positions usually drives most of a portfolio’s crash loss. Measure each holding’s contribution as its weight times its fall in past crashes, not by its percentage drop alone. In the 2018 trade‑war selloff, NVIDIA fell 56.0% from peak to trough while the S&P 500 fell 20.2% (same data). A 20% position in a stock like that would have cost the portfolio about 11 points by itself.
That is a crash replay. A related measure, crash liability, splits the loss in your portfolio’s worst 5% of months by holding. You can estimate your crash loss with the crash loss tool.
Not always. Assets that look independent in calm markets can fall with stocks in a sell‑off, and bonds can fall with stocks when rates rise.
| Asset (Exent’s data) | Correlation with SPY, calm months | Correlation, all months | 2022 return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small caps (IWM) | 0.76 | 0.86 | −20.5% |
| Dividend stocks (SCHD) | 0.71 | 0.82 | −3.2% |
| Minimum volatility (USMV) | 0.77 | 0.87 | −9.4% |
| Long Treasuries (TLT) | 0.18 | 0.19 | −31.2% |
| Aggregate bonds (AGG) | 0.32 | 0.40 | −13.0% |
Monthly returns since mid‑2016; calm months exclude the 16 months when SPY fell more than 4%. Stock‑based diversifiers became more tied to the market once the bad months were included. Long Treasuries lost 31.2% in 2022, a year when the S&P 500 lost 18.2%. A diversifier needs testing in more than one kind of crisis.
The look‑through step needs each fund’s published holdings list; the ETF overlap tool helps there. The other steps need only monthly returns, a spreadsheet and an hour.
Concentration that does not look like concentration: several funds and stocks that own or behave like the same few large companies. In 144 anonymized Exent portfolios, the median top five holdings were 77.2% of the money.
Calculate the correlation of monthly returns for each pair over three to five years. Pairs above about 0.7 tend to move together and should be sized as one position.
Yes. In 2022, when rates rose fast, long Treasuries (TLT) lost 31.2% and the aggregate bond fund AGG lost 13.0% in Exent’s data, while the S&P 500 lost 18.2%.
Each holding’s share of the portfolio’s loss in its worst 5% of months. Positive means the holding added to the damage; negative means it absorbed some.
Exent maps your correlation clusters and replays your holdings through five past crashes in about a minute.
Educational content, not investment advice. Examples are illustrative; past performance does not guarantee future results.