AnalystsInsight

Best Real Estate Analysts on Wall Street: Track Records Ranked

Exent ranks 22 real estate analysts among Wall Street’s 1,000 by price‑target hit rate, returns after their calls and number of ratings, from a 7‑year backtest. How the sector’s analysts do, and who ranks below the members‑only top 22.

Published Updated 3 min readHow we research

Key takeaways

  • 22 of the 1,000 analysts Exent ranks cover real estate mainly; their median price‑target hit rate is 39.0% (all analysts: 52.4%).
  • A median 58.2% of their calls were up 12 months later; targets that were hit took a median 109 days.
  • Every ranked real estate analyst is in the sector’s top 50, so the whole list is members‑only in Exent Gems.

How accurate are real estate analysts?

Median across the sector’s analystsReal EstateAll analysts
Price‑target hit rate39.0%52.4%
Calls up after 12 months58.2%64.0%
Median 12‑month return of calls+4.7%+13.4%
Median days to hit target109 days91 days

The top‑ranked real estate analysts

The top 22 real estate analysts are the ones Exent Gems follows in this sector. Who they are and what they are rating now is for members; their records are below.

Sector rankAnalystFirmStarsHit rate
#14.8★—
#24.8★48.4%
#34.8★—
#44.8★40.2%
#54.8★—
#64.7★35.6%
#74.7★34.7%
#84.7★—
#94.6★42.9%
#104.6★33.1%
  • #1
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    4.8★
    Hit rate
    —
  • #2
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    4.8★
    Hit rate
    48.4%
  • #3
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    4.8★
    Hit rate
    —
  • #4
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    4.8★
    Hit rate
    40.2%
  • #5
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    4.8★
    Hit rate
    —
  • #6
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    4.7★
    Hit rate
    35.6%
  • #7
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    4.7★
    Hit rate
    34.7%
  • #8
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    4.7★
    Hit rate
    —
  • #9
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    4.6★
    Hit rate
    42.9%
  • #10
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    4.6★
    Hit rate
    33.1%

How analysts are ranked

Every rating with a price target over a 7‑year lookback is replayed: was the target reached, how fast, and what the stock returned 1, 3, 6 and 12 months later. The ranking combines success rate, average return and number of ratings; the sector rank orders the analysts whose main sector is real estate. Sector figures are medians, so one star analyst does not carry the group. All sectors and the overall ranking.

Past performance does not guarantee future results. Historical figures are calculated by Exent from market data and are for education only; they are not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security.

Frequently asked questions

In Exent’s ranking, the top real estate analyst reached — of price targets over a 7-year lookback, against a 39.0% median for the sector. The names and live calls of the top 22 real estate analysts are members-only in Exent Gems (exent.ai/radar).

Across the 22 real estate analysts in Exent’s ranking, the median price-target hit rate was 39.0% over a 7-year lookback, against 52.4% for all analysts, and a median 58.2% of their calls were up 12 months later.

Get the picks Wall Street’s best analysts agree on.

Exent tracks 4,000+ analysts, keeps only the elite few with proven records, and surfaces the Gems where they agree.

See this week’s GemsLimited offer$1.95 for full access· full access

Educational content, not investment advice. Examples are illustrative; past performance does not guarantee future results.

DISCLAIMER: Exent AI is an informational research platform and does not provide investment advice, financial advice, or act as an investment adviser, broker-dealer, or fiduciary. All content, analytics, and model outputs are provided for educational and informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any financial instrument. Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. Exent AI does not execute trades, hold customer funds, or provide brokerage services. Past performance and hypothetical results are not indicative of future results. Third-party data and AI-generated outputs may be incomplete or inaccurate.