AnalystsInsight

Best Consumer Staples Analysts on Wall Street: Track Records Ranked

Exent ranks 11 consumer staples analysts among Wall Street’s 1,000 by price‑target hit rate, returns after their calls and number of ratings, from a 7‑year backtest. How the sector’s analysts do, and who ranks below the members‑only top 11.

Published Updated 3 min readHow we research

Key takeaways

  • 11 of the 1,000 analysts Exent ranks cover consumer staples mainly; their median price‑target hit rate is 54.7% (all analysts: 52.4%).
  • A median 69.4% of their calls were up 12 months later; targets that were hit took a median 103 days.
  • Every ranked consumer staples analyst is in the sector’s top 50, so the whole list is members‑only in Exent Gems.

How accurate are consumer staples analysts?

Median across the sector’s analystsConsumer StaplesAll analysts
Price‑target hit rate54.7%52.4%
Calls up after 12 months69.4%64.0%
Median 12‑month return of calls+16.6%+13.4%
Median days to hit target103 days91 days

The top‑ranked consumer staples analysts

The top 11 consumer staples analysts are the ones Exent Gems follows in this sector. Who they are and what they are rating now is for members; their records are below.

Sector rankAnalystFirmStarsHit rate
#14.9★49.3%
#24.9★58.8%
#34.8★65.7%
#44.8★—
#54.7★54.7%
#64.7★65.6%
#74.7★41.2%
#84.7★57.5%
#94.6★52.1%
#104.5★—
  • #1
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    4.9★
    Hit rate
    49.3%
  • #2
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    4.9★
    Hit rate
    58.8%
  • #3
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    4.8★
    Hit rate
    65.7%
  • #4
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    4.8★
    Hit rate
    —
  • #5
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    4.7★
    Hit rate
    54.7%
  • #6
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    4.7★
    Hit rate
    65.6%
  • #7
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    4.7★
    Hit rate
    41.2%
  • #8
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    4.7★
    Hit rate
    57.5%
  • #9
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    4.6★
    Hit rate
    52.1%
  • #10
    Analyst
    Firm
    Stars
    4.5★
    Hit rate
    —

How analysts are ranked

Every rating with a price target over a 7‑year lookback is replayed: was the target reached, how fast, and what the stock returned 1, 3, 6 and 12 months later. The ranking combines success rate, average return and number of ratings; the sector rank orders the analysts whose main sector is consumer staples. Sector figures are medians, so one star analyst does not carry the group. All sectors and the overall ranking.

Past performance does not guarantee future results. Historical figures are calculated by Exent from market data and are for education only; they are not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security.

Frequently asked questions

In Exent’s ranking, the top consumer staples analyst reached 49.3% of price targets over a 7-year lookback, against a 54.7% median for the sector. The names and live calls of the top 11 consumer staples analysts are members-only in Exent Gems (exent.ai/radar).

Across the 11 consumer staples analysts in Exent’s ranking, the median price-target hit rate was 54.7% over a 7-year lookback, against 52.4% for all analysts, and a median 69.4% of their calls were up 12 months later.

Get the picks Wall Street’s best analysts agree on.

Exent tracks 4,000+ analysts, keeps only the elite few with proven records, and surfaces the Gems where they agree.

See this week’s GemsLimited offer$1.95 for full access· full access

Educational content, not investment advice. Examples are illustrative; past performance does not guarantee future results.

DISCLAIMER: Exent AI is an informational research platform and does not provide investment advice, financial advice, or act as an investment adviser, broker-dealer, or fiduciary. All content, analytics, and model outputs are provided for educational and informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any financial instrument. Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. Exent AI does not execute trades, hold customer funds, or provide brokerage services. Past performance and hypothetical results are not indicative of future results. Third-party data and AI-generated outputs may be incomplete or inaccurate.